Social Links Search
Tools
Close

  

Close

INDIANA WEATHER

All Indiana Communities to Participate in Opioid Settlement



Attorney General Todd Rokita has successfully brought together every Indiana city, town and county to participate in a historic $507 million settlement that will bring massive relief to Hoosiers struggling with the devastating effects of the opioid epidemic.

"Today marks a milestone victory in our battle against drug addiction," Rokita said. "This scourge has inflicted such unspeakable pain on so many Hoosiers. We are fighting daily for our families, friends and neighbors. By all of us working together, we can ensure a brighter day is coming."

Achieving the participation of all 648 political subdivisions in Indiana -- i.e., cities, towns and counties -- required overcoming several obstacles. The most significant impediment came from outside attorneys who initially convinced several individual communities to pursue their own litigation rather than opt into the statewide settlement.

And later, once those same private attorneys conceded the best course was to join the statewide settlement, some of them insisted on building into the disbursement plan greater windfalls for themselves.

"Some lawyers seemed enticed by the prospect of big paydays," Rokita said. "We worked with our partners in local government to make sure the opportunity to serve the public good won out over private pecuniary interests."

The settlement funds will support local law enforcement efforts, drug task forces, regional treatment hubs, and early intervention and crisis support, among other important programs.

Indiana technically is party to two settlements -- one with Johnson & Johnson, which manufactured and marketed opioids, and one with the nation's three major pharmaceutical distributors (Cardinal Health, McKesson and AmerisourceBergen).

The overall arrangement is part of a $26 billion agreement settling allegations of 46 states and many units of local government against the four companies.

"No amount of money will ever compensate families for the loss of loved ones," Rokita said. "But a settlement of this magnitude helps prevent similar types of corporate irresponsibility from ever happening again."

Rokita and his team worked directly with elected members of the Indiana General Assembly and local government leaders to create a statutory structure that will efficiently distribute funding directly to local communities.

This past session, House Enrolled Act 1193 vastly improved upon a previous existing framework that featured too much state-level bureaucracy. Previously, the Indiana Family and Social Services Administration (FSSA) would have acted as a "middleman" distributing funds to local governments.

"Together, we have created an excellent disbursement plan for our opioid settlement," Rokita said. "From the very beginning, my own mission was to ensure that our local communities received the maximum funding possible -- and that the individual communities also could decide exactly how to use the funds they received."

The settlement framework continues to be a 50-50 split between the state and local governments.

Thirty percent of the settlement funds with "no strings attached" is split evenly between local communities and the state. That 30 percent can be used however local communities and the state choose to use them.

The other 70 percent is designated for opioid abatement efforts in local communities. State leaders decide exactly how to allocate half that amount -- or 35 percent of the total. And this year's legislation now ensures that local governments decide exactly how to allocate the other half of that total.

'Local government is closest to the people and most aware of community needs," Rokita said. "So that's where the best decisions can be made regarding exactly how to spend these funds. Just as I did as Secretary of State and in Congress, I will continue to trust the wisdom of local leaders."

Indiana Pig Farmer to Lead National Pork Board Indiana Pig Farmer to Lead National Pork Board
Purdue Report Shows Food Insecurity, Sustainable Food Purchasing Differences Purdue Report Shows Food Insecurity, Sustainable Food Purchasing Differences

Categories: Indiana, Government & Policy

Subscribe to Farms.com newsletters

Crop News

Rural Lifestyle News

Livestock News

General News

Government & Policy News

National News

Back To Top