By Andi Anderson
Hunger aid groups across the country are raising alarms over a proposal to cut up to $300 billion from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), the primary federal food aid program. The House Agriculture Committee recently approved a measure to require states to share SNAP costs, aiming to redirect funds toward other Farm Bill programs.
The proposal passed in a narrow 29-25 vote, dividing lawmakers along party lines. Supporters of the bill argue that shifting costs to states could help fund $60 billion in agriculture-related initiatives. However, food security advocates warn of serious consequences for low-income families.
Leaders from hunger relief organizations say the cuts could impact millions, especially working families with children. In one state alone, nearly 130,000 households led by adults with school-aged children could lose benefits by 2028.
Local food banks have expressed concern that they cannot meet the rising demand if the cuts proceed. Nationally, SNAP is a cornerstone of hunger relief, distributing nine meals for every one that food banks provide. This gap could overwhelm non-profit food distribution networks.
Hunger aid organizations are urging lawmakers to reconsider, stressing that food assistance is critical to public health, education, and economic stability. They warn that removing federal support without a clear replacement plan could worsen food insecurity across urban and rural communities.
The larger Farm Bill containing the proposed cuts did not advance in the House and has been sent back to the committee for revisions. Advocates continue to call for stronger federal commitment to supporting families facing food insecurity.
As discussions continue, many are watching closely to see how lawmakers balance agricultural priorities with the needs of the nation’s most vulnerable.
Photo Credit: gettyimages-zbynek-pospisil
Categories: Indiana, General