By Andi Anderson
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is reshaping how the Clean Water Act is enforced by narrowing the definition of “waters of the United States,” commonly known as WOTUS. This change affects protections for small streams, wetlands, and other remote water bodies that are now at risk of losing federal oversight.
The EPA, in partnership with the Army Corps of Engineers, released a memo in March interpreting the Supreme Court’s Sackett v. EPA decision in the narrowest sense. Wetlands are now only protected if they have a continuous surface connection to larger bodies like rivers or lakes.
This shift was praised by industries such as agriculture, mining, and construction. They believe the new rule offers clearer regulations and fewer delays. “We are not polluters,” wrote Carl Ray Polk Jr. of the Texas & Southwestern Cattle Raisers Association, adding that their lands are far from navigable waters.
However, environmental advocates warn of increased pollution and flooding. Jim Murphy from the National Wildlife Federation said the change threatens streams that provide drinking water for millions and hold floodwaters that protect communities.
Farm-heavy states such as Iowa already face serious water pollution from runoff. The narrowing of the law may worsen conditions, with fewer streams and wetlands receiving basic federal protection.
Tribal leaders are also raising alarms. In arid regions like the Southwest, many tribes depend on seasonal streams. Limiting what counts as protected water may reduce tribal rights and protections. “A one-size-fits-all approach is unfair,” said tribal advocates.
EPA officials say they aim to create a lasting rule, but debate continues. While some celebrate the rollback as long overdue, others fear a return to unsafe water conditions last seen in the 1960s.
Photo Credit: gettyimages-zms
Categories: Indiana, Government & Policy